Faculty Member, Sepehr Danesh Higher Education Institute, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Cinema represents one of the most significant entertainment phenomena, and its political nature refers to the instrumental use of cinema’s media persuasion power. Unlike television, which is predominantly under state control and naturally aligns with governmental directives in cultural, social, and political affairs, a portion of Iranian film production is carried out by private and independent sectors. This study investigates whether independent media productions by the private sector can emerge without political labeling, and to what extent political contexts in Iranian cinema extend into broader social issues. Due to the power structure and its pervasive influence across social strata in various historical periods, serious Iranian cinema inherently assumes a political dimension regardless of subject matter, thus being considered political. Contrary to the development of cinema in Western societies as a response to social needs—particularly entertainment—the introduction of cinema in Iran was welcomed by the political regime of 1900 (1279 SH). Following World War II, “political cinema” emerged in Third World countries such as Chile and Mexico under the influence of the Soviet regime. This research is motivated by the extensive production, discourse, and critique of two cinematic forms— “Farsi films” and “art films”—popular among both general and niche audiences. However, the political cinema genre and its relationship with power, especially its extension into non-political social issues, have been less explored. Politically, the term “political” corresponds to public affairs and power; philosophically, it involves the pursuit of freedom and the transformation of the object into a subject confronting power. In both senses, power is central. Power has played a crucial role in media—particularly cinema—in production, content, and distribution since the introduction of filmmaking technology in Iran, as governments have been key industrial and financial actors from the outset. Due to the sensitivities of governing institutions, most Iranian cinema is interpreted as political, either through social critique or praise of power.